Legal, Governmental, and Developmental Perspectives on the Governance of the Raden Anom Customary Forest
Keywords:
Customary Forest, Legal Pluralism, Forestry, FPIC, SustainabilityAbstract
This study examines the transformation of customary forest governance in Indonesia following the enactment of the Job Creation Law (Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja), with a specific focus on the customary forest of Raden Anom Village, Sarolangun Regency, Jambi. It explores how legal reforms have affected institutional authority, community participation, and environmental management. Employing a juridical-empirical approach, the research integrates statutory analysis with a case study based on legal documents, court decisions, and in-depth interviews with customary leaders, village officials, and local stakeholders. Findings reveal a governance shift from local wisdom–based conservation toward investment-oriented management, as centralized licensing reduces regional autonomy and subordinates customary law to state law. Customary institutions have adopted adaptive strategies by integrating customary norms into official village documents, establishing forestry units, and fostering cross-institutional collaborations. However, these strategies face constraints due to limited legal capacity, economic pressures, and uniform regulations. Such conditions impact environmental integrity, social cohesion, and economic equity, with the risk of a tragedy of the commons when community-based monitoring mechanisms weaken. The study underscores that effective reform requires harmonizing national legal instruments with local governance mechanisms and implementing polycentric governance principles to balance ecological sustainability with economic development. Policy recommendations include revising implementing regulations to restore local autonomy, ensuring consistent application of free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), and strengthening institutional capacity through targeted technical and resource support.
Downloads
References
Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). (2023). Catatan Akhir Tahun 2023 Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. https://aman.or.id/files/publication-documentation/39048CATAHU AMAN 2023 - LYTD.pdf
Arauf, M. (2021). Konsep Pengelolaan Hutan Adat di Indonesia: Sebuah Kasus di Bengkalis, Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.33884/jck.v9i1.3724
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. In Oñati international series in law and society.
Berman, P. S. (2020). Sally Engle Merry and Global Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12515
Block, W. E. (2011). Review of Ostrom’s Governing the Commons. Libertarian Papers, 3(1–21).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology,Qualitative Research in Psychology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 3(2).
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods 5th ed.
Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356
Colchester, M., & Chao, S. (2013). Conflict or consent? The oil palm sector at a crossroads. https://www.forestpeoples.org/publications-resources/reports/article/conflict-or-consent-the-oil-palm-sector-at-a-crossroads-2/
Fisher, R., Prabhu, R., & McDougall, C. (2007). Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests in Asia: Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines. In Adaptive collaborative management of community forests in Asia: experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002350
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24). https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2017). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. In Global Governance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254234-12
Kementerian Investasi/BKPM. (2021). Pedoman OSS-RBA.
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2012). Putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012.
Nawir, A. A., & Santoso, L. (2005). Mutually beneficial company-community partnerships in plantation development: Emerging lessons from Indonesia. In International Forestry Review (Vol. 7, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.2005.7.3.177
Ola Gelu, K., Yohanes, S., & Kosmas, E. (2023). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU- X/2012 Terhadap Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat. COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(02). https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i02.778
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146384
Ostrom, E. (2019). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the Policy Process, Second Edition (pp. 21–64). Routledge.
Perkumpulan HuMa. (2019). Pengaturan dan Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Omnibus Law RUU Cipta Kerja. https://publikasi.huma.or.id/pub/88-pengaturan-dan-perlindungan-hak-masyarakat-hukum-adat-dalam-omnibus-law-ruu-cipta-kerja
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan.
Republik Indonesia. (2020). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Saragih, R. A., Sembiring, R., Suhaidi, & Andriati, S. L. (2023). Analisis Hukum Penguasaan dan Pengelolaan Hutan Adat oleh Masyarakat Adat (Studi Hutan Adat Tombak Haminjon Desa Pandumaan dan Desa Sipituhuta Kabupaten Humbang Hasudutan). Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(3).
United Nations. (2007). United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples. Resolution 61/295. United Nations General Assembly.
Von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2001). Legal Pluralism and Social Justice in Economic and Political Development. IDS Bulletin, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32001006.x
von Benda-Beckmannn, F., & von Benda-Beckmannn, K. (2006). The dynamics of change and continuity in plural legal orders. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(53–54). https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756597
Wiyono, B. (2018). Kedudukan Hutan Adat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/Puu-Ix/2012 Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pengelolaan Hutan Di Indonesia. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v1i1.3709
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eza Tryandi, Cici Sundari (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.